Russia threatens to take the Nord Stream explosions case to the International Court of Justice

Moscow is ramping up pressure on the investigations into the Nord Stream pipeline explosions, accusing Germany, Denmark, and Sweden of not meeting their obligations under international conventions.

Partagez:

Since the September 2022 explosions that damaged the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines, Russia has repeatedly accused the West, particularly the United States and the United Kingdom, while calling for a transparent investigation. These pipelines, which transported Russian gas to Germany via the Baltic Sea, were critical to Russia’s energy policy, enabling it to bypass land routes, particularly those crossing Ukraine and Poland.

The Kremlin has leveraged this incident to intensify its rhetoric against the West, citing a lack of transparency in ongoing investigations. Maria Zakharova, spokesperson for the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, recently announced that Russia is considering taking the matter to the International Court of Justice (ICJ), based on the 1997 Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombings and the 1999 Convention on the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism. This announcement follows what Moscow calls a “Western attempt to cover up” a sabotage that compromised strategic infrastructure.

Russia’s accusations and ongoing investigations

European authorities launched investigations, but the results have not identified the perpetrators. Germany issued an arrest warrant for a Ukrainian citizen, Volodymyr Z., suspected of being one of the key actors in the attack. Media reports indicate that this suspect fled Poland to Ukraine shortly after the warrant was issued. This complicates the legal procedures, and both Danish and Swedish investigations have closed without identifying any suspects.

Additionally, recent information from the Financial Times suggests that elements of the German investigation indicate that Volodymyr Z. acted with other accomplices. These reports, based on anonymous sources close to the investigation, suggest that the saboteurs had pre-planned the attack, using professional diving techniques to place underwater explosives at critical points along the pipelines.

Impact on Russia-EU energy relations

The impact of these explosions goes beyond material damage. The Nord Stream pipelines were essential for gas transit to Europe, and their destruction marked a turning point in energy relations between Russia and the EU. Before the attack, Germany relied on Nord Stream 1 to secure its energy needs, while Nord Stream 2, newly built, had not yet started operations. These infrastructures were seen by Moscow as strategic geopolitical tools, enabling Russia to bypass traditional routes through Ukraine and reduce the influence of transit countries.

The destruction of the pipelines forced Europe to seek other energy supply sources, increasing its dependence on liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports from the United States and Qatar. Germany, the main client of these infrastructures, has also accelerated efforts to strengthen the resilience of its energy network. However, these adjustments come at a high economic cost and do not fully compensate for the losses since the halt of Russian gas flows.

Legal and diplomatic prospects

Bringing this case before the International Court of Justice could have significant diplomatic consequences. If Russia proves that European countries did not meet their obligations, it could affect the legitimacy of future investigations into similar incidents. However, such a procedure can take years and depends on the recognition of the ICJ’s jurisdiction by the concerned parties, further complicating the situation.

In the meantime, Moscow maintains pressure, claiming that the Nord Stream explosions were planned by Western intelligence services, accusations that the United States and the United Kingdom continue to firmly deny. Russia is also using this issue to strengthen its ties with non-European partners, such as China, and to develop new export routes to Asia to compensate for its energy revenue losses in Europe.

The Australian government is considering the establishment of an east coast gas reservation as part of a sweeping review of market rules to ensure supply, with risks of shortages signalled by 2028.
The increase in oil drilling, deepwater exploration, and chemical advances are expected to raise the global drilling fluids market to $10.7bn by 2032, according to Meticulous Research.
Enbridge Gas Ohio is assessing its legal options following the Ohio regulator's decision to cut its revenues, citing potential threats to investment and future customer costs.
The European Union extends gas storage regulations by two years, requiring member states to maintain a minimum fill rate of 90% to ensure energy security and economic stability amid market uncertainties.
The potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz places Gulf producers under intense pressure, highlighting their diplomatic and logistical limitations as a blockage threatens 20 million daily barrels of hydrocarbons destined for global markets.
Woodside finalises the divestment of a 40% stake in the Louisiana LNG project to Stonepeak, injecting $5.7 billion to accelerate developments and optimise financial returns ahead of first gas delivery scheduled in 2026.
Keranic Industrial Gas seals a sixty-day exclusivity deal to buy Royal Helium’s key assets, raise CAD9.5mn ($7.0mn) and bring Alberta’s Steveville plant back online in under fifteen weeks.
The Irish-Portuguese company Fusion Fuel strengthens its footprint in the United Arab Emirates as subsidiary Al Shola Gas adds AED4.4 mn ($1.2 mn) in new engineering contracts, consolidating an already robust 2025 order book.
Cheniere Energy validates major investment to expand Corpus Christi terminal, adding two liquefaction units to increase its liquefied natural gas export capacity by 2029, responding to recent international agreements.
A study by the International Energy Agency reveals that global emissions from liquefied natural gas could be significantly reduced using current technologies.
Europe is injecting natural gas into underground storage facilities at a three-year high, even as reserves remain below historical averages, prompting maximized imports of liquefied natural gas (LNG).
Budapest and Bratislava jointly reject the European Commission's proposal to ban Russian energy supplies, highlighting significant economic risks and a direct threat to their energy security, days ahead of a key meeting.
South Korea abandons plans to lower electricity rates this summer, fearing disruptions in liquefied natural gas supply due to escalating geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, despite recent declines in fuel import costs.
Russia positions itself to supply liquefied natural gas to Mexico and considers expanded technological sharing in the energy sector, according to Russian Energy Minister Sergey Tsivilyov.
Israel has partially resumed its natural gas exports to Egypt and Jordan following a week-long halt due to the closure of two major offshore gas fields, Leviathan and Karish.
Nepal reveals a significant potential reserve of methane in the west of the country, following exploratory drilling conducted with technical support from China, opening new economic prospects.
Petronas formalizes a memorandum with JOGMEC to secure Japanese LNG deliveries, including a first cargo from LNG Canada scheduled for July at Toho Gas.
Libya officially contests Greece's allocation of offshore oil permits, exacerbating regional tensions over disputed maritime areas south of Crete, rich in hydrocarbons and contested by several Mediterranean states.
Belgrade is currently finalising a new gas contract with Russia, promising Europe's lowest tariff, according to Srbijagas General Director Dusan Bajatovic, despite Europe's aim to eliminate Russian imports by 2027.
TotalEnergies and QatarEnergy have won the Ahara exploration licence, marking a new stage in their partnership with SONATRACH on a vast area located between Berkine and Illizi.