Ending Coal Use Through Carbon Credits?

A Rockefeller Foundation-led initiative aims to prematurely close coal-fired power plants in developing countries using carbon credits to reduce CO₂ emissions.

Share:

Comprehensive energy news coverage, updated nonstop

Annual subscription

8.25£/month*

*billed annually at 99£/year for the first year then 149,00£/year ​

Unlimited access • Archives included • Professional invoice

OTHER ACCESS OPTIONS

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2£/month*
then 14.90£ per month thereafter

FREE ACCOUNT

3 articles offered per month

FREE

*Prices are excluding VAT, which may vary depending on your location or professional status

Since 2021: 35,000 articles • 150+ analyses per week

In the vicinity of Manila, a coal-fired power plant hopes to become a model for developing countries striving to abandon this polluting fossil fuel. An alliance led by the Rockefeller Foundation, a philanthropic group, plans to help close this plant ten years earlier than scheduled, avoiding millions of tons of emissions by monetizing them as carbon credits.

“The idea is ‘pretty simple’,” explains Joseph Curtin, general director of Rockefeller’s energy and climate team, to AFP. “What if, instead of selling this high-carbon energy to the electrical grid, the coal owner could sell the avoided carbon emissions?”

Essentially, carbon credits allow a polluter to “offset” their own emissions by paying for “avoided” emissions elsewhere. They have been used to fund a large number of initiatives, from electric buses to protected forests, although it later emerged that many projects overestimated or incorrectly calculated the avoided emissions.

According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), coal is the leading source of human-induced carbon dioxide emissions. Some developed countries have gradually phased it out. However, it remains a cheap and reliable resource for developing economies facing growing energy demand.

Reluctance to Give Up Coal

Countries like Indonesia and South Africa have been offered billions of dollars to prematurely close coal-fired power plants. Without much success so far. “There isn’t a single coal-fired power plant, out of the 4,500 in emerging markets and developing countries, that has been closed and replaced with clean electricity,” regrets Mr. Curtin.

Because the problem is more complex than it seems. Not only is coal an affordable and reliable energy source, but it also represents millions of direct and indirect jobs. In Asia, power plants are often recent, meaning years of lost revenue in case of premature closure.

“There simply isn’t an economically viable exit strategy for the owners of these assets,” notes Mr. Curtin.

“Coal to Clean Credit Initiative” (CCCI)

This is where the “Coal to Clean Credit Initiative” (CCCI, “Initiative du charbon au crédit propre”) comes in. A program that aims to cover both the cost of closing coal-fired power plants and converting them to renewable energy production, notably wind and solar, by generating carbon credits.

With a pilot project: the South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation (SLTEC) in the Philippines. This coal-fired plant is scheduled to operate until 2040. But under the CCCI, it would close ten years early, which would avoid 19 million tons of CO₂ emissions, according to the Rockefeller Foundation.

The plant would be replaced by a mix of renewable energy production and battery storage, and workers and the local community would be compensated.

Criticism and Challenges

However, the idea is subject to criticism, especially after the revelation of problems related to other carbon credit projects. A recurring issue: proving that emissions would not have been avoided anyway. This has hindered numerous forest protection programs, where promoters have failed to demonstrate that wooded areas were actually at risk of being cut down.

Elsewhere, trees meant to be protected were cut down while credits had already been sold to protect them. As renewable energies become cheaper, some argue that, carbon credits aside, market forces alone will eventually kill coal-fired power plants.

Future Perspectives

“It is difficult to know what forces are pushing for or against the gradual elimination of coal,” says Gilles Dufrasne from the think tank Carbon Market Watch. “These economic and political forces can change significantly,” he told AFP. According to him, carbon credits risk becoming a way to “reward investors who have placed their money in a highly polluting and doomed technology.”

Other analyses warn against the temptation for some countries to “double count” emission reductions related to coal plant closures, by including them in their national calculations even if these reductions have already been sold as carbon credits to offset emissions elsewhere. According to Mr. Curtin, the CCCI methodology is designed to avoid these pitfalls.

Only solvable coal-fired power plants, covered by long-term agreements and connected to the grid are eligible. Participating companies must permanently renounce coal and closures must be accompanied by a conversion to renewable energies and support for populations.

“And if someone has a better idea, let them share it with us,” assures Mr. Curtin. “Because we are constantly seeking new ways to address this problem.”

With dense industrial activity and unique geological potential, Texas is attracting massive investment in carbon capture and storage, reinforced by new federal tax incentives.
GE Vernova and YTL PowerSeraya will assess the feasibility of capturing 90% of CO₂ emissions at a planned 600-megawatt gas-fired power plant in Singapore.
The carbon removal technology sector is expanding rapidly, backed by venture capital and industrial projects, yet high costs remain a significant barrier to scaling.
A Wood Mackenzie study reveals that the EU’s carbon storage capacity will fall more than 40% short of the 2030 targets set under the Net Zero Industry Act.
A bilateral framework governs authorization, transfer and accounting of carbon units from conservation projects, with stricter methodologies and enhanced traceability, likely to affect creditable volumes, prices and contracts. —
Carbon Direct and JPMorganChase have released a guide to help voluntary carbon market stakeholders develop biodiversity-focused projects while meeting carbon reduction criteria.
Japan and Malaysia have signed a preliminary cooperation protocol aiming to establish a regulatory foundation for cross-border carbon dioxide transport as part of future carbon capture and storage projects.
Green Plains has commissioned a carbon capture system in York, Nebraska, marking the first step in an industrial programme integrating CO₂ geological storage across multiple sites.
The price of nature-based carbon credits dropped to $13.30/mtCO2e in October as a 94% surge in September issuances far outpaced corporate demand.
Driven by the energy, heavy industry and power generation sectors, the global carbon capture and storage market could reach $6.6bn by 2034, supported by an annual growth rate of 5.8%.
Article 6 converts carbon credits into a compliance asset, driven by sovereign purchases, domestic markets, and sectoral schemes, with annual demand projected above 700 Mt and supply constrained by timelines, levies, and CA requirements.
The GOCO2 project enters public consultation with six industrial players united around a 375 km network aiming to capture, transport and export 2.2 million tonnes of CO2 per year starting in 2031.
TotalEnergies reduced its stake in the Bifrost CO2 storage project in Denmark, bringing in CarbonVault as an industrial partner and future client of the offshore site located in the North Sea.
The United Kingdom is launching the construction of two industrial carbon capture projects, backed by £9.4bn ($11.47bn) in public funding, with 500 skilled jobs created in the north of the country.
Frontier Infrastructure, in partnership with Gevo and Verity, rolls out an integrated solution combining rail transport, permanent sequestration, and digital CO₂ tracking, targeting over 200 ethanol production sites in North America.
geoLOGIC and Carbon Management Canada launch a free online technical certificate to support industrial sectors involved in carbon capture and storage technologies.
AtmosClear has chosen ExxonMobil to handle the transport and storage of 680,000 tonnes of CO₂ per year from its future biomass energy site at the Port of Baton Rouge, United States.
The Dutch start-up secures €6.8mn to industrialise a DAC electrolyser coupled with hydrogen, targeting sub-$100 per tonne capture and a €1.8mn European grant.
Japan Petroleum Exploration is preparing two offshore exploratory drillings near Hokkaidō to assess the feasibility of CO₂ storage as part of the Tomakomai CCS project.
The Singaporean government has signed a contract to purchase 2.17 million mtCO2e of carbon credits from REDD+, reforestation and grassland restoration projects, with deliveries scheduled between 2026 and 2030.

All the latest energy news, all the time

Annual subscription

8.25£/month*

*billed annually at 99£/year for the first year then 149,00£/year ​

Unlimited access - Archives included - Pro invoice

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2£/month*
then 14.90£ per month thereafter

*Prices shown are exclusive of VAT, which may vary according to your location or professional status.

Since 2021: 30,000 articles - +150 analyses/week.