Breakup of Gas Transit via Ukraine: Stakes and Consequences for Europe and Russia

The expiration of the gas transit agreement between Russia and Ukraine highlights the energy and economic challenges for the European Union, Russia, and Ukraine, exacerbating Europe's dependence on Russian gas and geopolitical tensions.

Share:

Comprehensive energy news coverage, updated nonstop

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access • Archives included • Professional invoice

OTHER ACCESS OPTIONS

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

FREE ACCOUNT

3 articles offered per month

FREE

*Prices are excluding VAT, which may vary depending on your location or professional status

Since 2021: 35,000 articles • 150+ analyses per week

The announcement by Alexander Novak, Russian Deputy Prime Minister, regarding gas transit via Ukraine reveals several strategic issues for Russia, Ukraine, and the European Union (EU). At the end of 2024, the current gas transit agreement between Russia and Ukraine is set to expire. While Russia is open to continuing supplies, Ukraine has repeatedly stated that it will not renew this agreement. This situation places the EU in a delicate position, as some European countries continue to rely on Russian gas flows for their energy consumption.

Despite the drastic reduction in EU imports of Russian gas since the beginning of the war in Ukraine, countries like Slovakia, Austria, and Hungary still depend on these supplies. Slovakia, in particular, is in a vulnerable position as it lacks solid alternatives. It might attempt to establish a reverse flow from Austria or import via liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals in Germany, but this would incur additional costs.

Economic Impact for Ukraine

For Ukraine, the end of gas transit could have significant economic consequences. Currently, Kyiv generates approximately 714 million euros in annual revenue from Russian gas transit, which is below the initially projected 1.25 billion euros. However, maintaining this infrastructure is costly. The Ukrainian pipeline network, designed to transport large quantities of gas, requires high maintenance costs, estimated at around 892 million euros per year, to remain operational. If Russian transit stops, Ukraine will need to find alternative means to finance these costs while ensuring that the pipelines continue to meet domestic needs.

Repercussions for Russia and the EU

Russia could suffer a loss of 7 to 8 billion dollars in annual revenue, representing about 15% of Gazprom’s total revenue. These losses could not be offset by alternative markets for several years. The construction of the “Power of Siberia 2” pipeline to China is not planned before 2030, and an LNG terminal project on the Baltic Sea would not be operational until 2026-2027. Additionally, the end of this transit could trigger damage claims from European customers, some contracts of which extend until 2040.

For the EU, the loss of 15 billion cubic meters of gas transported via Ukraine each year would be a shock for some Central and Eastern European countries. Even though the EU’s overall dependence on Russian gas has been reduced, Russia’s share in total gas imports remains significant, accounting for about 15% in the second quarter of 2024, just behind the 19% from the United States. Countries like Hungary and Slovakia, which do not have access to the sea for importing LNG, would be forced to find other sources at a much higher cost.

Strategies and Perspectives

To attempt to circumvent the potential blockage, one of the options being explored is for European companies to sign transport contracts directly with Ukraine, rather than through bilateral contracts with Gazprom. This would allow Ukraine to continue to collect transit fees while aligning with European needs. However, any definitive cutoff of gas flow through Ukraine would significantly increase costs for EU countries that are already using reverse flow mechanisms to import gas at lower costs.

The situation remains complex and evolving. A definitive rupture of transit via Ukraine would harm not only Russian gas revenues but also the energy security of several European countries. Russia might turn more towards Asia, but these markets will not compensate for European losses in the near future. On its side, Ukraine could benefit from a reorganized transit system, but this would require significant investments to adapt its infrastructure. For Europe, finding alternative solutions remains limited by geographical constraints and high logistical costs.

The final decision will depend on negotiations between the EU, Ukraine, and Russia, as discussions have already been initiated to explore options via other routes, notably through Turkey and Azerbaijan.

Manila plans to expand gas and renewable energy production to meet a 6.6% increase in electricity demand over the next two years.
Ottawa and London increased bilateral exchanges to structure strategic cooperation on nuclear energy and critical minerals supply chains, as part of Canada’s G7 presidency.
Donald Trump says he secured Narendra Modi’s commitment to end Russian oil imports, adding political pressure to India-Russia trade relations.
Under intense diplomatic pressure from Washington, member states of the International Maritime Organization agreed to postpone by one year the adoption of a carbon pricing mechanism for global maritime transport.
Washington confirms it has mandated the CIA to carry out secret actions against Nicolas Maduro’s government, escalating tensions between the United States and Venezuela amid geostrategic and energy stakes.
Two European Parliament committees propose to advance the full halt of Russian hydrocarbon imports to 2026 and 2027, including oil, gas, and LNG, strengthening the European Union’s geopolitical position.
The COP30 conference hosted in the Amazon by Brazil faces low participation from global leaders, amid geopolitical tensions and major logistical challenges.
The United States has granted Trinidad and Tobago a special licence to resume negotiations with Venezuela on the Dragon gas field, partially lifting restrictions imposed on the Venezuelan energy sector.
Ambassadors of European Union member states have approved the transmission of a legislative proposal to phase out Russian fossil fuel imports by January 2028 to the Council of Ministers.
The State Duma has approved Russia’s formal withdrawal from a treaty signed with the United States on the elimination of military-grade plutonium, ending over two decades of strategic nuclear cooperation.
Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said it was not in Poland’s interest to extradite to Germany a Ukrainian citizen suspected of taking part in the explosions that damaged the Nord Stream gas pipelines in 2022.
Al-Harfi and SCLCO signed agreements with Syrian authorities to develop solar and wind capacity, amid an ongoing energy rapprochement between Riyadh and Damascus.
Faced with risks to Middle Eastern supply chains, Thai and Japanese refiners are turning to US crude, backed by tariff incentives and strategies aligned with ongoing bilateral trade discussions.
France intercepted a tanker linked to Russian exports, prompting Emmanuel Macron to call for a coordinated European response to hinder vessels bypassing oil sanctions.
The activation of the snapback mechanism reinstates all UN sanctions on Iran, directly affecting the defence, financial and maritime trade sectors.
Commissioner Dan Jørgensen visits Greenland to expand energy ties with the European Union, amid plans to double EU funding for the 2028–2034 period.
European and Iranian foreign ministers meet in New York to try to prevent the reinstatement of UN sanctions linked to Tehran’s nuclear programme.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announces a bilateral agreement with Mexico including targeted investments in energy corridors, logistics infrastructure and cross-border security.
The US president has called for an immediate end to Russian oil imports by NATO countries, denouncing a strategic contradiction as sanctions against Moscow are being considered.
Tehran withdrew a resolution denouncing attacks on its nuclear facilities, citing US pressure on IAEA members who feared suspension of Washington’s voluntary contributions.

All the latest energy news, all the time

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access - Archives included - Pro invoice

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

*Prices shown are exclusive of VAT, which may vary according to your location or professional status.

Since 2021: 30,000 articles - +150 analyses/week.